News and Information Related to Women's Health Issues. Learn about hormones, birth control, pregnancy, menopause, breast exams and much more.
A Member of the Healthscout Network
 Printer Friendly  Send to a Friend

Bone Therapy May Not Always Need Monitoring

In older women, annual measurements are unnecessary, study finds

WEDNESDAY, June 24 (HealthDay News) -- Monitoring bone density in older women after they've started taking drugs to prevent osteoporosis is unnecessary and could be potentially misleading, researchers say.

In the study, Australian researchers analyzed data from a large randomized trial that compared the effects of the drug alendronate (a widely used bisphosphonate) in more than 6,000 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, which is a risk factor for fractures.

Advertisement
Related Stories
 border=
Papaya Could Be a Cancer Fighter
'Pill' Won't Shorten Your Life: Study
Online Dating as Honest as Real Life
Related Videos
 border=
Incision-Free Bladder Surgery
Tracking Breast Cancer with Less Pain
5 Breast Cancer Myths
Related Slides
 border=
Pelvic Inflam Disease
Placenta Abruptio
PMS
Related Encyclopedia
 border=
Amenorrhea
Amniocentesis
Amniocentesis and CVS


The women's bone density was measured at the start of the study and again one, two and three years later. After three years of treatment, 97.5 percent of the women who took the drug showed at least a modest increase in bone density, and there was little variation in the treatment effect between individuals, the researchers found.

The findings, which appear online June 24 in BMJ, suggest that monitoring a person's response during the first three years of the treatment is unnecessary and, because of the potential to mislead, should not be done, concluded the researchers, from the School of Public Health at the University of Sydney.

The results support the case against routine monitoring during the early years of treatment, according to an accompanying editorial by Juliet Compston, professor of bone medicine at the University of Cambridge, in England. She said that when changes in bone mineral density are used to monitor treatment, people may be given inappropriate advice.

"Routine monitoring of bone mineral density during the first few years of antiresorptive treatment cannot be justified because it may mislead patients, lead to inappropriate management decisions and waste scarce health care resources," she concluded.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases offers tips on bone health for life.

-- Robert Preidt

SOURCE: BMJ, news release, June 23, 2009

Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Last updated 6/24/2009



Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational purposes only and does not serve as a replacement for care provided by your own personal health care team. This website does not render or provide medical advice, and no individual should make any medical decisions or change their health behavior based on information provided here. All pertinent content provided on this website should be discussed with your personal physician to evaluate whether it has any relevance to or impact on your specific condition. Reliance on any information provided by this website is solely at your own risk.


Mar 12, 2010
Home
Search
Powered By HealthLine
New! For timely and trustworth health information, expert advice and much more, visit Breast Cancer Connection
Patient Guide
News
Health Videos
Health Encyclopedia
Health News Archive
Affiliate Information
HealthScout Network
Contact Us
Newsletters
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.
About The HealthScout Network Contact Us
Copyright © 2001. The HealthCentralNetwork, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy  Terms of Service  

To find more information on specific conditions, please visit our partner sites: